Case Details of Each Separate Violation Supporting Genocide Claim

From The Allen Laws

Petersen v Allen
Father is lured into marriage proposal October 2000 and solely supports child's mother and her daughter from a former relationship in luxury accommodations. During such time he is physically and emotionally abused and witnesses child abuse of the 2 year old stepdaughter. Physical assault while caring for the family includes overnight lock-outs in freezing weather by the mother during Texas ice storms, physical assault with a thrown object (candle stick) causing visible facial injury, and assault while in control of a motor vehicle on Oklahoma State highways causing loss of control of a motor vehicle in excess of 50 mile per hour. Each assault was unprovoked, of a complete surprise, and solely instigated by the child's mother. Witnesses include Christopher Melton Maidt of Nicoles Hills, Oklahoma; William Warner of Davis, Oklahoma; Matthew Grider of Davis, Oklahoma; and Elizabeth Peta Botelho of Ada, Oklahoma. Such abuse included death threats issued September 7 2001 terminating contact with the child, witnessed independently by Jennifer Kara Metzger (born Sugarland, Texas); and intimidation using a deadly weapon and threat of false arrest to interfere with and terminate visitation which did impact contact with the child after kidnapping during limited visitation between August 11 2001 and September 7 2001. Abducting mother did file "abandonment" October 17 2001 in Dallas County court after these acts, and failed to appear at trial at any time before the defendant. Summary judgment against the defendant was issued with prejudice of gender and refused appeal causing 8 years of separation, tremendous emotional and social injury, and irreparable harm due criminal negligence of offices of the State of Oklahoma and Texas. Such abuse carried out despite renewed threats against the father in 2003, against witnesses in writing across state lines, and use of the father's full legal name by the abductor from 2002-2004 to commit commercial criminal Interstate defamation of the left-behind parent and sabotage corporate relationships of the father's firm and career to impede recovery. Threats continued in 2007, 2008, and via commercial venues citing the child kidnapping, trademarks of the father's firm, and efforts to damage and derail the commercial ventures of his company in marketplaces over 90 miles from his home and across State lines using threats of extortion targeting the business in 2008 March linked to the 2002-2004 defamation documents and kidnapping from servers based in California to audiences in Oklahoma. Mr. Allen has, after this abuse, been denied ALL CONTACT with his child since September 7 2001, and has been under duress prohibiting lawful contact and bond since the 81st day of the child's birth. At the time of kidnapping, Mr. Allen was under the impression his spouse-to-be was driving the family to Ada, Oklahoma for permanent resettlement where he could guarantee pediatric and medical care, financial support, and a job at his former employer (Sykes Enterprises, Inc) until such time as the 2001 recession eased. The mother of the child was in physical control of Mr. Allen's motor vehicle, and refused to stop the car when the ruse was revealed - threatening to take the children and walk the street if Mr. Allen resisted. This duress and denial of surrender of a motor vehicle, forced transport of an officer of a corporation of the State of Oklahoma against his will, and detainment using children as a weapon fall under Title 18 USC Sec 1201 and 1202 (kidnapping and ransom) of the body and person of Mr. James Allen, and is cause for the separation and concealment later that hour of his only son and the half-sister of the child he raised from infancy in October 2000 to last contact August 2001. A child whom the mother insisted call him "dad" and form a bond as strong and real as that with his only biological child, and in whose name and hostage taking the capture and concealment of his proven son was accomplished and carried out due legal barriers to removing both children citing child abuse by mother and endangerment from immediate family members. Although the original order was issued in Texas, it directly disregarded the Native Citizenship of Mr. Allen as an Citizen of Oklahoma since 1975 and shared Citizenship and full and equal rights of parents under Oklahoma State Law in such matters (Kelley v Kelley).

Maidt v Maidt
Child removed from custody of father after he was hospitalized in Florida. Mother concealed child most of the years she had possession in violation of court order. Sherriff located child being concealed and returned custody only in early teens. Child support exceeded gross income without lawful modification on complaint. Father reduced from high technology job to poverty. Mother committed welfare fraud (convicted) and Florida took child support to pay for fraud at the expense of the child and father. Child expelled from school at 16 in the State of Oklahoma due to drug and behavior problems, found to be pregnant (conception during mothers custody period), and emancipated by Choctaw Nation citing serious misconduct in the case. Upon emancipation and birth of the grandchild, State of Oklahoma Department of Human Services workers took the newborn baby and transferred custody to the grandmother - who had initiated the abductions and concealed the birth mother for years leading to this circumstance. Choctaw Nation intervened, citing genocide and no blood relationship of the grandmother to the tribal rolls under genocide complaint. Grandchild returned to 16 year old mother. Birth-mother (Mr. Maidt's child) will turn 18 in Septemeber 2009. Has born 2 more children since this incident and is now a mother of 3 at the age of 18. Oklahoma Department of Human Services sought to force Mr. Maidt to pay child support, including $8000 on condition of release after arrest, upon learning Mr. Maidt was a key criminal witness in the Petersen v Allen case - present during the physical abduction of the Petersen child, and testifying against that abuse. Mr. Maidt was jailed for days while friends raised $8000 to pay the "contempt of court" claim issued by the Oklahoma Judge. Upon payment, Mr. Maidt was released, and the court "lost" the $8000. The State sought to re-arrest Mr. Maidt on this charge and would have held him without credit had he not retained his receipt of payment to prove the surrender of such funds. Months later, The Oklahoma Department of Human Services sought again to force Mr. Maidt to pay child support until his daughter obtained her GED or turned 26 years old, disregarding the abuse which led to the lack of supervision and expulsion of his daughter, genocide attempt against his granddaughter, and 1991-2009 saga of parental alienation and defamation of his former good name. Mr. Maidt is now a contractor for the Choctaw Department of Defense services at Tinker AFB. He is a trustworthy person according to United States Federal Authorities and competent in his testimony of these matters before the State and Federal Government of the United States. Although Mr. Maidt's issue began in Florida, he and his former spouse moved to Oklahoma, where misconduct detailed above continued without relief.

Cooper v The State of Oklahoma
Mr. Cooper - a Citizen of the State of Oklahoma - was accused of heinous crimes by his spouse in a bitter custody dispute. Such allegations were never proven or admitted, but abuse was such that he eventually surrendered lawful rights and privileges to his children because he felt the dispute was harming them. After this dispute, he met a new spouse and conceived a child with her. Upon birth, the Oklahoma Department of Human Services seized that child without cause or lawful order and upon the basis of the prior dispute in conflict with both parents, initiating a dispute which prompted Mr. Cooper and others to formulate Oklahoma State Question 745 and 749, seeking criminal prosecution of those parties breaking the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG). However, Mr. Cooper and his associates were told by The Governor of the State of Oklahoma and others that there was "no law" prohibiting these abuses and those responsible, where guilty, were immune to prosecution due to their office. At the time, Mr. Cooper was unaware of the International Treaty and significance of such SUPREME LAW under Article 6 of the United States Constitution, and so did not seek to have the immunity (complicity with genocide) waived due mis-information of a legal nature and advice provided in support of an International and Federal crime by offices of the State of Oklahoma. He instead sought political reform and a public referendum on the subject, obtaining widespread support and creating a contact list of persons wronged by Oklahoma Department of Human Services (OKDHS) across the State of Oklahoma. Financial incentives, including Federal Taxpayer funds, created to support this fraud by officers of the State in violation of Federal Law (Title 18 USC Sec 1001) were discovered and documented, in conjunction with similar abuses in Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois, and other States. Mr. Cooper and The Parental Rights Coalition of Oklahoma, in cooperation with the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Association (PKPA) founded by Mr. Allen, are now lobbying for a political and public campaign to address the crime of flagrant "genocide" the patter of abuse and standing defense ("that there is no law" protecting parents, no class, or such protections waived by the State under 10th Amendment right to deny Federal Treaty and Constitutional authority as inferior to State powers and judicial authority) which legal scholars of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma cite as "sedition, treason, and open revolt" pursuant Article I of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma and other fundamental Federal Constitutional documents such as the Federalist Papers (No. 84).

Douglas Williams, Ada-OK
Was served by the Wewoka Office of Gary W. Dart with demands he pay child support for his son to the mother of the child, regardless the award in the actual court order that he RECEIVE child support pursuant the result of drug tests and allegations of neglect and emotional abuse, such as calling the child a 'burrito' and other inane defacing behavior in addition to unlawful high-risk conduct documented in his plea. While resolved after significant dispute, this evidence shows GROSS INCOMPETENCE OF OFFICE in the Wewoka County seat of Child Support Enforcement and Services, similar to letters issued to Mr. Allen claiming "we only collect the money" on his complaint of criminal extortion without trial or minimal due process and demand for a hearing to modify support below FEDERAL LIMITATIONS (presently 75% of gross income, despite demands for relief and a hearing for 8 years). Similar letters from Howard H. Hendrick also demand the corporation of Mr. Allen pay his child support because he receives no income and the firm is obligated to its investors (American Express, Capital One, Bank of America, etc) prior to paying shareholders or owners from profits. In these letters, Mr. Hendricks office failed to spell the corporation name correctly despite numerous written warnings issued by CERTIFIED MAIL, demonstrating no lawful reading of such CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS and dismissal without regard subject to Federal Criminal charge of Title 18 USC Sec 1519 and 875, in conjunction with abuse of a Federal EPA and IRS violation whistleblower to benefit the State named in those complaints (a Title 18 USC Sec 1513e Felony, punishable by 20 years in Federal Prison).