History of the Allen Kidnapping
From The Allen Laws
After the initial engagement in 2000, the biological mother moved into Mr. Allen's leased 3000 square foot 3rd floor apartment at 2502 Live Oak Lofts, Dallas Texas, and willingly abandoned her job against Mr. Allen's advice to be solely supported by Mr. Allen from 2000 to August 11 2001.
During this time she attended Christmas gatherings with his family in the State of Oklahoma and encouraged him to raise her daughter (2 years old) who was also allowed to live at the loft and given 1/4th of the premise (full bedroom, private bathroom).
The biological mother encouraged the child to call Mr. Allen "Dad" and refused to identify the biological father of the young girl to her family. She stated the girl's father was an employee of a movie theater where the mother worked, the result of at-work fraternization, and that the father had not been informed of the pregnancy. In contrast, the woman's family had been told the father did not want the child and had abandoned the mother or forced her to have sex, and at several times the family asked Mr. Allen if he knew the identity of the girl's father - so that they might carry out violence against him in retaliation for the alleged account of her hardship.
In the months between November 2000 and August 2001, the biological mother assaulted without provocation the person of Mr. Allen causing injuries including a swollen face, closed eye, and requiring ice before the witness of William Warner, Matthew Grider, and Christopher Melton Maidt on two occasions. One assault occurred while on Oklahoma highway 235 North near the capitol of the State of Oklahoma, causing loss of control of a motor vehicle and near fatal wreck while the young child was a passenger in the back seat of the car.
This attempt was nearly fatal to the entire family, completely without warning, and appeared to be a suicide attempt in the State of Oklahoma on Oklahoma highways involving a minor child. Mr. Allen took refuge at the Nichols Hills Radio Shack immediately after this assault, observed by Christopher Melton Maidt (an employee there at the time), and would have called police if not for fear of loss of contact with his unborn child should charges be sought.
In defense, the mother cited sexual child abuse between the ages of 3 and 5 years which triggered violent outbursts and did report mood swings to her pediatrician for which she was prescribed anti-depressants in mid 2001.
Contents |
SPOUSAL ABUSE OF Mr. ALLEN by the Abducting Mother
On numerous occasions, as witnessed by Sean Pike, William Warner, Matthew Grider, and others - Mr. Allen was locked outside his apartment in the Winter of 2000 by the mother of the child in sub-zero temperatures for the duration of the night.
These actions were not reported to police because of repeated concealment of the minor female child in retaliation for perceived slights, and limitation of rights to protect the child from possible abuse or neglect which Mr. Allen was witness to - at risk and on threat of perpetual concealment of his own child and stepdaughter.
The marriage, originally slated for prior the May 2001 birth, was postponed at insistence of the biological mother stating she intended to be wed but wanted to have the baby first and lose weight before commemorating the marriage. Mr. Allen agreed to these terms, having never been married prior and wishing to make the most of the event to please his fiancee'.
KIDNAPPING
On August 11 2001, one day after his contract ended and after making an outlay of $10,000 USD to pay the medical costs of the birth - which were uninsured due to denial of coverage from Mr. Allen's policy at the insistence of the mother, the biological mother abducted Mr. Allen during a business trip while in physical possession and control of his motor vehicle. She delivered Mr. Allen to the apartment of her former boyfriend, and that man then removed and concealed Mr. Allen's newborn child while the mother remained with him and threatened him with perpetual loss of contact if he did not leave immediately. This transpired before a representative of another Oklahoma Corporation who was the hiring party for a commercial offer and during travel by two car convoy to the State of Oklahoma with this official, who remains willing and ready to testify to these events.
In the subsequent weeks, Mr. Allen was lured to make contact with the child and such contact restricted on demand of monetary gifts and favors, including the use of a cell phone in the name of his company, for commercial job applications by the abducting parent. When the bill arrived, it became clear this phone was being used as a land line for contact between the abductors and a charge created by abuse of the service. An attempt to take the child for 24 hours by mutual consent was terminated by threat of false arrest on false charge against Mr. Allen by the child's biological maternal grandmother, who did brandish a knife to demand Mr. Allen put his son down and leave the house immediately without provocation - or face false allegation of assault and domestic violence threatened verbally by the grandmother.
Alone and in Dallas with very limited funds, Mr. Allen complied under duress and civil protest. Subsequent to this threat, apologies were issued by the biological mother to Mr. Allen despite her complicity in this threat and allegations of a false nature to support such action, and then verbal and psychological abuse carried out during the Sept 7th 2001 visitation including calling Mr. Allen "Mr. Asshole" repeatedly and before the children over 12 times in half an hour - ending in Mr. Allen's civil departure from the residence.
The minor female child began repeating the namecalling to Mr. Allen, which caused him to cry, and at such act as he tried to calmly leave without upsetting the child the little girl did follow him only then realizing this behavior encouraged by the mother was hurtful to Mr. Allen. The namecalling was brought on by refusal to surrender the phone permanently to the biological mother and her refusal to pay any portion of the usage fees she created - which Mr. Allen could not then pay in full and would be forced to have the service canceled. Mr. Allen stopped to calm his stepdaughter, and promised her he would return soon to see her. She was not assured, and asked him to bring the family cat. On hearing this, the mother exclaimed, "Don't bother! We will get another cat!"
DEATH THREATS
On the drive home in the company and witness of another professional, Mr. Allen called Cingular Wireless to cancel the service to the stolen phone and was told he could not do so unless he pressed charges. Fearing for his child's safety, Mr. Allen asked the operator to simply terminate the phone 'for legal reasons' and agreed to the penalty in contract to avoid risking further contact to his child by sending police into the dispute - hopeful it would resolve in 24-48 hours. He then received a phone call from the biological mother that was recorded on voicemail and played back before the witness, in which the biological mother threatened to "kill" Mr. Allen if he "attempted to see, contact, or visit his children again".
These threats were discussed and deemed credible and serious threat of bodily harm and death, and so reported to Dallas County police who refused service to Mr. Allen in the Texas felony charge of "threat to murder" citing his gender and custody issues at stake in the case. September 9th 2001, Mr. Allen spoke with the biological mother again by instant messenger wherein she demanded he surrender medical insurance to the child and then refused the offer to split the cost ($400) claiming she would pay for his needs herself alone. Such offer neccessary as Mr. Allen had depleted his savings and had no income at this time to pay $400 due to the abduction and concealment without lawful cause and in course of fraud carried out by the biological mother and her family and former boyfriend.
Mr. Allen was in fact forced to abandon his home and lost property due to the financial damages, and removed to an apartment to pursue recovery of his children instead of return to Oklahoma to carry out his business duties. October 17 2001, a Sheriff of Dallas County served Mr. Allen a summons from Dallas County Court alleging he had "abandoned" his newborn child, and accusing him of such action to justify child support in excess of $100,000 USD for 18 years or more. Mr. Allen sought out an attorney and responded, pleading innocence and demanding paternity testing prior formal criminal charges on several Federal counts.
FAILURE OF ACCUSER TO APPEAR
The plaintiff and their attorney did not appear at the 1st or 2nd hearing in 2000, and only reportedly appeared at the 3rd and final hearing in May 2001 while Mr. Allen and his party were forcibly detained by Court security in the 1st floor lobby without cause and under threat of being expelled if he (alone) did not submit to a second metal detector screening and do so ONLY AFTER EVERYONE ELSE IN THE LINE BEHIND HIM DURING THE FIRST SCREENING WENT THROUGH FIRST. These precautions and actions, during the hysteria after 9-11 attacks on the United States, did not justify the "default judgment" against Mr. Allen alleging he did knowingly and purposefully abandon his newborn child, which Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott has upheld despite plea of mistrial within the hour and docket of the hearing to the unlawful detainment and denial of opportunity to EVER face the accuser in these proceedings or hear ANY evidence other than proof of his paternity by genetic testing outside of wedlock.
Such discrimination is a violation of International Treaty benefiting a gender by religious basis and state license to procreate, a form of ethnic genocide in the complete loss of contact with the child from the paternal family for 7 years (August 11 2001 to present), and financial duress issued in demands equal to or exceeding the income of Mr. Allen at that time and not withstanding physical evidence of Interstate Interference in Commerce carried out knowingly and maliciously for the purpose of suppressing Mr. Allen's personal relationships and recovery efforts of the abducted child, thereby denying him his offspring and the capacity to carry out a normal life or possess a family or child under the public and recognized status of a responsible and trusted parent in the community of Texas, his home State Oklahoma, and worldwide due global defamation searchable from 2002-2004 as the 1st result for his legal name and related meta data search criteria from his LLC used to commit commercial sabotage and defamation (libel).
CRIMINAL DENIAL OF STATE AND FEDERAL RELIEF
Rather than investigate, appeal, or act on these matters, Texas and Oklahoma authorities treated Mr. Allen as guilty, violating Title 28 USC Sec 1738Ae, and did deny him the right to criminal charges despite attempted murder supported by written threats related the child kidnapping in November 2002 and March 2003, and also deny enforcement of complaint in related threats issued Sept 2003 against a witness in Federal Criminal complaint in the State of Oklahoma who represents by Citizenship the United Kingdom and the People's Republic of China - and who further has been directly targeted for retaliation in this matter in November 2002, September 2003, March 2008, and May 2008. Such action, in pattern of criminal Interstate and International extortion, violate a number of Federal Laws (Title 18 USC Sec 1201-1204, 1951, 1001, 1509, 872, 873, 875, 876, 1513e, and 1519).
