Number and Policy Findings Supporting Genocide by Oklahoma and Texas
From The Allen Laws
Oklahoma State Question 745, proposed in 2009, obtained over eighty-thousand (80,000) signatures attesting to gross misconduct of a criminal nature by Oklahoma Department of Human Services under the leadership of Direct Howard H. Hendrick of Oklahoma City. State Question 749 showed 670 individual signatures attesting to the need for criminal prosecution and immediate relief due violations of Constitutional Civil Rights and Federal Law in the State of Oklahoma. Enforcement actions in Oklahoma from June 2008 to March 2009 refused to grant lawful hearing on written demand of modification or appeal as required by Federal Law within 14 days at least once every two years in the matter of Petersen v Allen (2002, Dallas County Court - enforcement passed to Oklahoma June 2008 after two class actions lawsuits delaying payments in dispute and related criminal Interstate felony complaints of kidnapping and Interference in Interstate commerce as cause without due process or court order).
The pattern of misconduct by State officers of Texas and Oklahoma is documented in a series of threats issued in response to criminal complaints and plea for relief citing Federal law violations, such as those issued from the office of Oklahoma Director Gary W. Dart, in which chief agency officers plea "we only collect the money" to deny the Federal Law requiring modification hearings begin in 14 days of such notice.
Such misconduct is so noted in "Petersen v Allen (2002)", "Maidt v Maidt (2008)", "Bitara v The State of Texas" (a New Jersey claim citing Texas denial of Interstate Uniform Code of Juvenile Justice in dismissal of the full custody order of New Jersey and parental kidnapping to Texas for new jurisdiction without cause), "Cooper v The State of Oklahoma" - in which a child was taken on the basis of a PRIOR CIVIL JUDGMENT without regard to new trial or due process, indicating perpetual termination of parental rights as a policy without prior order or basis of law.
State Constitutional Law provides that any two Citizens of the State of Oklahoma may level State treason charges for abuse of office as described above. Further, that Interstate enforcement of child kidnapping without trial or due process, and in denial of appeal, is a violation of Title 28 USC Sec 1738A Paragraph E and the 4th Amendment pursuant Kelley v Kelly 2007 Dec (OK Supreme Court). Such kidnapping, hostage taking, and ransom without release or legal cause are covered under "Acts of War" against The People of the United States, and such action where endorsed by any public officers or officer in a position of public trust, High Treason. Also described under Article 4-2 and 6 (U.S. Treaty) as confinement and control of a group based on ethnic or fundamental discrimination through removal and concealment of children, destruction of dignity by unlawful and excessive fines, reduction to poverty without cause or due process for extended periods of time, public defamation to impeach the good name of the victim as a class on general slur or stereotype, and ultimately fitting the requirements by such actions to be labeled "genocide" - an International crime subject to punishment by Supreme Law of the United States Constitution under the CPPCG Treaty (1987).
