Relevant Facts of the Trial
From The Allen Laws
In the matter of Petersen vs. Allen, Dallas County October 17 2001, the defendant was accused of "abandonment" and convicted without:
- Right to face his accuser in the courtroom through non-appearance of the plaintiff in the first two hearings.
- Right to face his accuser by denial of summons until no more than 24 hours prior the May 2002 hearing due unlawful interception and retention of court notice by an employee of a competitive firm acting in the interest of the competitor and such action substantiated by later written release of the majority shareholder and acting CEO of that company to the plaintiff.
- Right to face the accuser by denial of entrance to the court prior the onset of proceedings due direct instruction and obstruction on threat of removal from the courthouse which was baseless, unprovoked, unreasonable, and resulted in humiliation of the defendant by subjecting him to re-undergo metal detector screenings after being placed at the end of the line he had already waited through before the ejection. Such ejection, the result of following the direct instruction of Dallas County court security to walk several feet outside the cordon in direct line of sight of the Dallas County court officer to ask directions to the courtroom from the Court Clerks desk. Such action witnessed by the same individual responsible for prior corporate written threats, and with possible cause or relationship to the presence of that private officer at the entrance of the court.
- Denied lawful mistrial or appeal by the sitting judge, who cited unlawfully "I've seen you, I've seen her, due process served!" in defense of granting default judgment to the plaintiff without a lawful hearing, which then resulted in $108,000 USD in damages to the defendant and loss of contact without lawful cause or legal hearing required under Title 28 USC Sec 1738Ae from August 11 2001 to present (2009 February).
- Such actions compounded by failure to serve notice and refusal to grant on lawful demand a copy of the court decision or record for appeal to the defendant, and no service of judgment until March 2003 and in response to defendant demands citing attempted murder March 2003 and November 2002 related to the child removal and persons in question.
- Equal opportunity to enter a plea (denied by the sitting judge on the grounds that the defendant was not present to respond, voided in May 2002 hearing violating United States Constitution Article 4 Section 2, 14th Amendment US Constitution, and Title 28 USC Sec 1738Ae).
