Religious Discrimination Factors
From The Allen Laws
Religions Claims
Mr. Allen has been subject to abusive claims due to the Native American nature of his corporate trademark, "Shadowdancers Digital Press". Shadowdancers are a term dating back over 1000 years in North American culture, referring to those who deal with the afterlife and the spiritual world. Slurs in recent Internet media include infringement by a New York corporation in adult media which is not related to the fine art and software development (visualization of film and special effects, similar to Battlestar Galactica and Stargate SG-1) which Shadowdancers LLC of Ada, Oklahoma engages in since 1990.
The firm Mr. Allen operates is a registered Limited Liability Corporation (LLC), with registered trade names: "SDP Multimedia Group", "Shadowdancers Digital Press (SDP)", "Militech.ORG" (formed in August 2001, citing intelligence from FBI sources of a potential pending attack on the United States as prior detailed by the FBI working group on Al Queda in 1997 to the Defcon.org mailing list, which Mr. Allen was a party), and "Militech Systems". The respective groups operate the media, consulting, and hardware components of a computer service business with prior client work for Toshiba America, PeoplePC, Best Buy USA, FirstUSA, BankONE, Nortel Networks, Southwestern Bell Corporation (DSL), America Online, Sprint, and other clients confidential. Mr. Allen's former titles include "Senior Software Engineer" and "Telecommunications Administrator" over a multi-center (7) International account known widely in the late 1990s. He has operated $500,000 systems from Lucent Inc. and assisted in 9-11 workflow and cellular phone service repair process development related to the attack on the World Trace Center as the sole officer of the Wireless Engineering Tools Division of Richardson (TX) for Nortel Networks (a service provider of cellular engineering and repair). Prior work is valued at $2 million in recovered billing, and $2 million in monthly nationwide account services for telecommunication support in commercial customer service systems. These figures confidential in nature to overall client books.
The present product of the corporation is a real-time high-quality simulation wargame for entertainment purposes aimed at mature audiences similar to Bethesda Softworks and Zenimax public title "Fallout 3", focusing on naval warfare and aerospace concepts with strong artificial intelligence and distributed in-flight pilot assist technologies. These products have potential value in the entertainment, automation, and real-world conditions of avionics. Interest in commercial espionage and even sabotage is established and proven in case incidents - as contracts for the service level of Mr. Allen's work exceeds $100,000 per year in value. Efforts to damage, defame, and otherwise force-out Mr. Allen from lucrative markets and clients using the kidnapping and concealment, false claims of cause supporting these unlawful acts, and injury to his personal credibility and trust, have cost the United States economic leaders over $250,000 in damages since 2001; and well over $900,000 in lost wages related the impact of prior misconduct.
Because the subject matter deals with military technology, scenarios, and war concepts - and confidentiality regarding the quality and nature of such events prohibits disclosure - slander seeking to associate the realism of space-war and conventional war with gore or violent video game regulation lobbies have further impacted the work and child abduction recovery efforts. Use of realism to justify discrimination against a parent, such as precluding a horror writer or special effects specialist from contact with their children, is absurd. However, the religious base of Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, and Missouri have been engaged by such lurid implications to further separate and slander the bond between James Arnold Allen and his abducted biological child and stepdaughter. In context, Mr. Allen has fought publicly to create a labeling system that separates games with realistic content from those with sexual themes and overt pornographic aspects designed to entice children to play, such as overt drug and substance abuse without penalties and promotion of prostitution and corruption as a natural way of life in foreign titles aimed at ages 14 and up. Mr. Allen has always insisted his products, stories, and content are for 'Mature Audiences' who are comfortable with scenes of graphic violence, and endeavored to create an environment of 'lasting implications' for violent actions known in the marketplace as 'serious games' - games that differ from the traditional 'entertainment only' and 'balanced game' theories of 95% of today's titles and products.
Unfortunately, due to the religious and theological aspects expressed in this work, critics have also sought to imply Mr. Allen is "not Christian" in an effort to justify his child's kidnapping and concealment. These claims stem from his study of Tao, Bhuddism, Islam, Nitche, Humanism, and clinical psychology (Bachelors of Science). Mr. Allen admits a strong influence by the artist Akira (Leiji) Matsumoto of Japan, as well as Gene Roddenberry, Rod Sterling, and other classic screenplay writers of the Cold War and American media works. These 'controversial' modern artists confuse traditional conservatives, and are frequently misunderstood or cast into the wrong genre due to associations with other less-than-serious Western Media or exploitation of themes beyond the creative control of those writers and artists.
Religion in US Law
Mr. Allen is 34, never married, and has been reduced to poverty and an income of less than $10,000 USD on average from the age of 26 (2001 August) to 2009. Prior, he was a c-level consultant and executive earning $60 to $75/hour in contract without complaint and retained as 'vital' due to his skill set in 2001 and 1998. He is second generation U.S. Military, son of electronic warfare specialist Arnold Allen, and nephew of the late Colonel Clyde Allen of Groom Lake / Las Vegas (NV) station. He has several times been engaged to be married since high school, but vicious rumors and jealous small-town abuse have terminated each of his prior engagements resulting in significant local slander impacting his small business in rural Ada, Oklahoma. After abuse in 1999 of his character and fraud resulting in theft of his client property by his former fiancee, he fled to Dallas to carry out a contract and open regional offices in the State of Texas. Here he met his son's mother and conceived a child while under the influence of alcohol and against his wishes. Despite this, he offered to marry and solely supported the mother until such time as she left August 11 2001 after extensive matrimonial fraud against Mr. Allen and unilateral physical spousal abuse by the mother against Mr. Allen, taking with her the children and leaving Mr. Allen on the verge of bankruptcy. She then carried out a purposeful campaign using public electronic forums and the "Gothic Industrial dance community" of Dallas to slander, defame, and call for the murder of Mr. Allen. Motive for this action is detailed in the social security benefits of $2000/month or more she would receive if he were killed while she was in possession or custody of his child.
Because of this abuse, Mr. Allen has retained a female witness from the United Kingdom, who is also a citizen of the People's Republic of China (PRC, Hong Kong), to witness and testify to the conduct and abuse carried out against his person and family by those responsible for the kidnapping, ransom, and concealment by State power and Federal inaction in his case. This has proven neccessary as claims of mental and emotional illness are provided without any basis in clinical fact or reality to support the ongoing kidnapping by the kidnappers using a variety of online social networking tools including but not limited to posts on LiveJournal.com, Myspace.com, and direct threats and messages to Ms. Botelho.
The use of these claims, in conjunction with religious prejudice rampant in the Oklahoma and Texas courts, as well as presentation to specific publics that the abductors (female) are victims of (falsely claimed) domestic physical and emotional violence or abuse (never charged, never proven, no basis in fact) - combined with the nature of Mr. Allen's technical work and genre of media - prejudice the audience and client contact. The main proponents of these claims are the former fiancee of Mr. Allen from 1997-1999 - who did threaten to kill his associate Lindsay Tarver in a jealous rage in 1999 and menace her in physical threat before Mark Deaver of Norman Computers, and later make offer of material aid in the murder of Mr. Allen in 2002 just 15 days prior his victimization by assault at gunpoint in a planned ambush outside his office.
In this time, Ms. Scarbrough (the 1997-1999 fiancee), has claimed religous conservative roots in Arkansas, launched a business modelled on the services and policies of Shadowdancers LLC to compete with the firm in Oklahoma and across State lines, and targeted for approach the clients and associates of the LLC in Oklahoma as recently as 2007-2009 soliciting they terminate all business with the firm and its projects conditional to working with her organization based in Tulsa, Oklahoma - which promotes horror, gothic-industrial nightclub, and bondage-dominance-and-sado-masochism (BDSM) sex-fetish events similar to those found in the Dallas metroplex club where Mr. Allen met his son's mother, a block from the office of his corporation in Deep Ellum. Evidence indicates coordination of these efforts of commercial competition, exploitation of Christian and non-Christian (Halloween/Horror/Goth) youth events, and collaboration with the abductors of Mr. Allen's child via Myspace, Facebook, and statements of collusion to damage or defer business relationships by Donald Beal before and in direct written release to Elizabeth P. Botelho across state lines. Such acts covered extensively under Title 18 USC Sec 1951 (Interference in Interstate Commerce), and duplication or corporate espionage of a registered corporation of the State of Oklahoma. Recent evidence of this is clear in the launch of a duplicate event for June 2009 and October 2009 promotions operated by Shadowdancers LLC in Oklahoma City (OK) by parties associated with the abductors in Tulsa (OK) on the same date and after prior attending planning meetings with the Oklahoma City event board. Timing of events opposite or adjoining LLC events to maximize financial damage and trade off the good name and investments of the LLC underline a pattern of predatory behavior in conjunction with criminal threats of public defamation and unlawful extortion linked to the kidnapping and concealment without cause of the child. Such actions designed to undermine financial operations of the business which would lend support to recovery of the child and prosecution of those responsible.
Unfortunately, the failure to wed prior the kidnapping of the child, brought about by physical and emotional spousal abuse of a malicious and premeditated nature, coinciding with concealment of an affair supporting the child kidnapping from the proven biological parent, contribute to the misconduct of the State in this matter. The claim of child paternity was DEMANDED by the defendant, Mr. James Allen, when refused the lawful right to plea for the return of his child by the sitting judge. This claim, as crafted, did not deny paternity rights to the child and was fundamental prima facia evidence required to initiate criminal Interstate Federal charges against those responsible. Instead, it was seen by the Texas family court judge as a 'denial' of responsibility, and damages assessed based on that established religious prejudice against an unwed father, presuming no bond or prior invested support or cause in loss of contact.
The stigma of this nature is actively supported with Federal Taxpayer Dollars by Greg Abbott, Attorney General of the State of Texas, who has since actively menaced and harassed Mr. Allen without lawful relief for 8 years, including a September 2009 written DEMAND TO BE PAID DIRECTLY while at the same time ALL CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS HAVE BEEN LAWFULLY MADE AND ACCOUNTED FOR SINCE NOVEMBER 2008 (end of last class action) BY THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. At the same time, the Oklahoma Department of Human Services sent written demand for the SAME PAYMENT on THE SAME CHILD AND CAUSE and their address. This DOUBLE BILLING underlines a pattern of abuse and criminal negligence which is inexcusable in a criminal kidnapping. In addition to the MAXIMUM PENALTY ALLOWED BY LAW, the State of Oklahoma is seeking $200/month in additional interest for the balance accrued during the legal dispute in class action of "Bitara v The State of Texas" and "Bitara v The United States", of which Mr. Allen's complaint was attached. Such combined penalty exceeds the 65% MAXIMUM CHILD SUPPORT ALLOWED BY FEDERAL LAW and qualifies as "excessive fine, cruel and unusual punishment, and oppression by power of office under color of law" which constitute State Treason charge.
Marriage as grounds for child removal
Evident in this case is the use of "religious convention" or "state license to procreate" associated with a tax on live birth by gender of the parent, violation of the right to travel from State to State based on religious grounds (prior) in procreation or conception outside of wedlock, and retaliation for report of such crimes to the public for extended period (7 years). As the child of a mother of 16 years of age, born out of wedlock, and adopted to a family who subsequently abused and neglected him for 15 years for the pretext of social and religious status, Mr. Allen is very sensitive to these violations of his son's fundamental right to know his natural father. Mr. Allen was denied the right to know his birth mother or father and informed only in his 30s of the validity of the infant memories which haunted him for 30 years. The pretext of such case, on such grounds, is therefore utterly unforgettable and redux of childhood trauma and abuse initiated on the father as a "bastard" in the 1970s and 80s. Mr. Allen, as a political advocate, would see matrimony and all rights associated with marriage struck down as a result of these abuses witnessed in his lifetime - reducing Matrimony to the honorable institution of a religious pretext that it should be, without State or Federal interference in the private lives and relationships of citizens or their reproductive rights.
This view often is confused with pro-gay marriage and homosexual rights by extreme conservatives, who fail to understand the scope and degree of abuse created by enforcing sexual conduct laws against consenting adults or penalties against victims of matrimonial and child-adoption/kidnapping/child-care-fraud. The prejudice in the present 'family' court is unacceptable, exceeding the limitations set by International Law and United States Federal Treaty which is the SUPREME LAW of the United States and in good order. The desire to impose religious beliefs on others by civil and criminal penalty, especially the taking and concealing of their children, is unacceptable and will not be forgotten or forgiven over time.
Use (fraud) to pretext and justify such malicious crimes as those described above, can only be prevented if religious license is eliminated as is the SUPREME LAW of the United States, and fraud in such agreements removed from the bonds of parent and child to the context of actual damages and injury as in conventional contract. Matrimonial fraud is a civil wrongdoing, but rarely awarded due to prejudice and slander, libel, and failure to prove fault in verbal agreements most often made behind closed doors or without witness. The purpose of marriage is to provide that witness, in ceremony, not to bind one class of Americans and deny the right to know their own children or peace or family in the future to others in dispute. The potential for abuse which corrupts and destroys the very principle and sacred trust of marriage is too great to sell this power or grant it validity or exclusive rights by law (prior or present or future damage) where consent of both parties exists and both parties are of the minimum age of consent (by State).
