Subsequent Actions After Trial

From The Allen Laws

1. Criminal demands of extortion of $108,000 from the owner of a foreign corporation (State of Oklahoma) paid to the Texas Citizen and matching Federal funds paid by Federal taxpayers to the State of Texas for collection of such funds.
2. Denial of mistrial on formal criminal complaint, and retaliation to include denial of lawful appeal or hearing for 8 years related class action litigation of the State, report (2002) of EPA violations including dumping of asbestos and EPA inspector corruption in Dallas County, IRS wage and social security payroll violations by Nortel Networks in Plano and Richardson Texas so reported in sworn complaint to the FBI field agent in Oklahoma City (OK) citing notation of multi-year on-site employees granted authority and title in the business before the public and over other Nortel Networks divisions, budgets, and employees under 1099m tax status - by which FICA and related funds were not paid violating the IRS regulations for 1099m and W2 employment in the sworn allegation.
3. Threat of murder November 2002 followed by assault at gunpoint, carjacking, kidnapping, and subsequent (March 2003) attempted murder by vehicular sabotage of the witness in the prior complaints.
4. Such attempts denied lawful investigation or prosecution related the prior complaint and civil case, a violation of Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Pub Law 107-204, 116 Stat, Sec 745) and Federal Law (Title 18 USC Sec 1513e and 1519) by the State and Federal Justice Department officers and law enforcement agents contacted and served sworn criminal complaint.
5. Extortion by threat of arrest on knowing false charge to obtain monies in excess of gross income by abuse of office (Title 18 USC Sec 1001) and use of U.S. Mail to deliver such threats (Title 18 USC Sec 876) related Interstate kidnapping and extortion (Title 18 USC Sec 875) and by color of law and abuse of office (Title 18 USC Sec 872).
6. Documented use of the defendants legal name in a ICANN domain to commit Interstate and International commercial sabotage and interfere in commercial relationships and business of a State of Oklahoma Corporation by individuals and corporations in the State of Texas including the abductor of the child, the biological parent named plaintiff in false civil trial, DOTSTER Registrar, and Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott. Such action terminated Sept 7 2004 after 2 years by ICANN intervention citing California Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act and republished March 2008 related Feb 2008 extortion threats issued in the State of Oklahoma relating the concealment of this child and published from servers physically located in the State of California to menace and damage business relationships and injure investors resident in the State of Oklahoma attached the targeted limited liability corporation. Such claims including false information and fraudulent allegations of parental fitness and quality of service deemed commercial and personal information and baseless by nature, malicious in intent and use, and criminal in application of Interference in Interstate Commerce (Title 18 USC Sec 1951) supporting a kidnapping and child concealment.
7. Such actions followed May 2008 by further threats via the State of California against company investors, threat of physical property damage from such servers July 2008, and threat of electrocution and bodily harm from the State of Texas via State of California servers against the defendant in the civil case and utilizing the trademarks and commercial brands of the LLC to index search efforts to these threats and the quality and products of the company related to the victim in August 2008.
8. Instant Message threats issued April 2009 supporting threats of extortion issued by SMS telephone text messages Feb 2008, including menacing language and an effort to intimidate a witness in a Federal criminal complaint against such testimony and allegation before the Grand Jury and a Federal criminal trial. Such evidence showing ongoing commercial criminal menace, in connection to advertising of competitive services by all parties named in the allegation seeking to advantage the markets and clients of the LLC and the service and professional work of the defendant whose child was taken unlawfully in 2001 and concealed from 2001 August to present by unlawful duress including threat of false criminal allegations, false arrest, serious bodily harm, murder, and perpetual loss of contact with the child.
9. State officers under oath including Gregg Abbott of Texas, Governor Rick Perry of Texas, Howard H. Hendrick (Director of Oklahoma Department of Human Services), and Gary W. Dart (Director Wewoka OK Child Support Enforcement) have knowingly destroyed reports served their office of criminal conduct related this matter and issued threats and demands without lawful cause or minimum due process violating Title 42 Chapter 7 Subchapter IV-D protections and Title 28 USC Sec 1738Ae Federal Law in this matter. Testimony from other victims indicates a pattern and policy of such criminal neglect under the auspice of presumed immunity from criminal charges for violation of civil rights, targeting of victims by gender and economic class, discrimination including denial of 4th, 6th, 13th, and 14th Amendment rights, violation of United States Constitution Article 4-2.1 and 6, and violation of Oklahoma Constitution Article XV-II (oath of office) in execution of these actions so alleged in sworn criminal affidavit before the Federal U.S. Attorneys office and the International court of the Hague pursuant claim of genocide, conspiracy to commit genocide, direct and public incitement to commit genocide, attempt to commit genocide, and complicity in genocide. Such charges violations of Article II b, c, d, and e of the International Treaty against genocide - whereby financial awards in excess of 65% of gross income and denial of criminal prosecution for threat of bodily harm or death or removal of children without writ or lawful cause or conviction terminating the parental rights of the accused are evident in physical documents, testimony, and demands served the victims including threat and consequences to obtain compliance in extortion and ransom (Title 18 USC Sec 1202). Such actions aggravated by denial of legal obligation to such treaty or Federal Law or authority by Governor Rick Perry in video testimony supporting Texas ruling in "Bitara vs. The State of Texas" which alleges Sovereign Immunity under the 10th Amendment as cause for these actions - and such immunity paramount to Title 18 USC Sec 1204 (International Kidnapping) charges against the officers and Governor, kidnappers, and their associates including theft of Federal Taxpayer funds under Title 42 Chapter 7 Subchapter IV-D for failure to honor the requirements of the Federal monies granted and fraud in their execution violating United States Sovereignty, Ratified United States Treaty (Article 6), and showing favoritism to the Citizens of their State over those of a foreign State of the Union in a court of law (Article 4-2.1). Such immunity claim, under U.S. Sovereignty, waived by International Treaty in all cases.

Main Page