Difference between civil and criminal conduct

From The Allen Laws

Jump to: navigation, search

Commercial Criminal Aspects

Where does a civil dispute for custody become a criminal matter, and such civil court become subordinate to that criminal protection under the 14th Amendment?

When a threat to murder, to force or detain against the will of one individual using for barter or hostage the bond or future contact or safety of a family member or minor child, or false statement before the public to obtain commercial advantage or damage without legal basis on the grounds of a private or civil dispute such as child visitation or access.

Such actions present in overwhelming physical evidence and by witness in the kidnapping of the child named in "Petersen v Allen 2002".


Civil vs Criminal Factors


A civil court is only capable of exercising its authority when the parties do not pose a direct and established threat to the life or welfare of the other, are not engaged in criminal conduct which supercedes the protections of the civil court that both parties remain active in public society, or conflict over the material threat to life, health, or welfare of a child such that the probability of kidnapping for purpose of concealment or flight to avoid prosecution is real and established by prior threat, claim, or behavior pattern.


At such time, where threat of 'perpetual' and 'unlawful' concealment does apply, the application of hostage taking and public exploitation without lawful relief across distinctly separate jurisdictions demands nothing less than sole custody and protection of the child and victimized parent from further predation. Cases including established or recorded physical violence in pattern behavior, mental instability such as diagnosed or treated clinical depression (see 2001, Pediatric script for Veronica Petersen), or direct threat to the commercial and public welfare of a State or technology and principle essential to the sustained "Full Faith and Credit" in the Judicial protection powers of the United States may represent a detriment to national security - such as kidnapping of the child of a corporation president or majority shareholder to carry out commercial influence or undermine United States commercial services and position in global markets. In such cases, criminal law supersedes civil law, and SUPREME LAW such as is detailed in U.S. Treaty under Article 6 of the Constitution of the United States and the "Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide" (CPPCG) must apply.



Main Page